The number of IRs using this software (developed at the
-
http://eprints.otago.ac.nz/es/
-
http://eprints.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/es/index.php?action=cumulative_usage_country
- African Higher Education Research Online:
http://ahero.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=cshe&action=statistics&view=country
-
http://eprints.ru.ac.za/es/index.php?action=cumulative_usage_country
- E-LIS Repository: http://eprints.rclis.org/stat/bycountry.html
As some examples in the table below show, the full text download usage by developing countries was very encouraging indeed.
Institutional Repository |
| based in the | | E-LIS, based in |
Period of usage | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | ? |
Number of records in repository | 666 | 5052 | 808 | 7525 |
Full text downloads | ||||
From | 2977 | 2070 | 10413 | 20934 |
| 4673 | 1649 | 10196 | 22879 |
| 5022 | 1032 | 27609 | 33125 |
| 1029 | 175 | 120598 | 5556 |
| 8926 | 12664 | 25392 | 63362 |
| 16830 | 44270 | 145356 | 1415807 |
. . . .and on to several hundred other countries | | | | |
Encouraged, I searched other IRs and found the same story unfolding. Multiply the number of registered IRs (> 1000) by the usage figures and you can see that developing countries are using IRs a lot! Usage will vary substantially depending on the nature of the deposited content and the working practices of different disciplines, but it is very encouraging to see how IRs are closing the N to S, S to N and S to S information gaps that we used to talk about. The low-cost nature of establishing IRs allows institutes in economically constrained countries to be part of the global research community, readily using and exchanging essential information.
We can earnestly hope that someone – soon – will carry out an authoritative study on the usage of IR material. This would be a magnificent contribution of value to many sectors. Perhaps someone is …?.